Rp/304/2020 Of Fabsun Engineering Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/304/2020 Of Fabsun Engineering Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Rp/304/2020 Of Fabsun Engineering Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, review petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2071.
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
BETWEEN:
R.P. NO.304 OF 2020
FABSUN ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED NO A/2 CASTEL, NO 5 CORNWELL ROADBANGALORE 560025 |REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.MR. N.C. SHETTY.
(BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYAN, ADV., FOR.SRI. IAN LEWIS, ADV.,)
.., PETITIONER
AND*
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER|WARD 11(2)CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING|NO. QUEEN ROAD, BANGALORE-O1.
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, AGA)
.., RESPONDENT
THIS R.P. IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4/7 RULE 1 OF CPC,PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 4.11.2020 PASSED|IN ITA NO.193/2015 TO THE EXTENT HEREIN PRAYED. ALLOW.THE PRESENT REVIEW PETITION, RECALL THE JUDGMENT DATED4.11.2020 IN ITA NO.193/2015 AND DIRECT HEARING OF THESAID APPEAL AFRESH ®& ETC,
THIS R.P. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS’ DAY, |
ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
ORDER
After nearing learned counsel for the parties andfor the reasons assigned in the petition, the judgment.dated 04.11.2020 passed in I.T.A.No.193/2015.
2 |After hearing learned counsel for the partiesand taking note of the fact that substantial question of law No.2 has not Deen answered in the judgment, the
judgment dated 04.11.2020 is recalled. In the result,|I.T.A.No.193/2015 is restored to file.
Accordingly, review petition is allowed.
Sd/-—
JUDGE.
Sd/-—JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.