Case LawHigh Court › Rp/304/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/304/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Prasad Technology Park Pvt Ltd

High Court 14 Jul 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/304/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Prasad Technology Park Pvt Ltd
Date of order
14 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Rp/304/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Prasad Technology Park Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the review petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byRUPA VLocation:High Courtof Karnataka NC: 2023:KHC:24791-DBRP No.304 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14 DAY OF JULY, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I. ARUN REVIEW PETITION NO.304 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX PRESENT ADDRESS, PCIT 5th FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 6TH BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12(2), PRESENT ADDRESS DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), 2ND FLOOR BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560095. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADV., FOR SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) AND: 1. M/S. PRASAD TECHNOLOGY PARK PVT. LTD. NO.2/10, POOJARI LAYOUT 3RD FLOOR, 80 FEET ROAD RMV II STAGE, BENGALURU-560094. NO.2/10, POOJARI LAYOUT 3RD FLOOR, 80 FEET ROAD RMV II STAGE, BENGALURU-560094. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PRATHIBA, ADV., FOR SRI. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.,) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW / RECALL THE ORDER DATED 28/09/2020 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN ITA NO.339/2014. TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the revenue submits that the tax involved in this appeal is Rs.1,07,94,200/-. 2. The aforesaid submission is fairly not disputed by learned counsel for the respondent. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the judgment dated 18.09.2020 ITA No.339/2014 is restored to file. Accordingly, the review petition is allowed. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan