Rp/31/2023 Of M/S Garden City Education Trust v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Exem)
High Court
03 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/31/2023 Of M/S Garden City Education Trust v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Exem)
Date of order
03 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/31/2023 Of M/S Garden City Education Trust v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Exem), the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedby D KBHASKARLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3 DAY OF MARCH, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
-REVIEW PETITION NO. 31 OF 2023 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. GARDEN CITY EDUCATION TRUST
NO. 628/C, 11 CROSS PRESENTLY AT GCC HOUSE 340, 5 MAIN INDIRANAGAR 1 STAGE BENGALURU - 560 038. RERPESENTED BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT - FINANCE MR. NAINAN P. OOMMEN AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, SON OF LATE MR. P.N. OOMMEN
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI S PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME - TAX (EXEM)
CIRCLE 17 (1) 4 FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE, MISSION ROAD BENGALURU - 560 027.
…RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER XLVII RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 28 OCTOBER 2022 PASSED IN ITA NO.66 OF 2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 1995-96 TO 1998-99.
THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR .J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri.S.Parthasarathi, learned advocate for petitioner submits that the petitioner has decided not to pursue the review petition and prayed to withdraw the same. A memo of even date is filed to the said effect.
2. Memo be kept in record. Leave granted.
Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue