Case Law › High Court › Rp/331/2021 Of Smt. Seema Bhattacharya v...

Rp/331/2021 Of Smt. Seema Bhattacharya v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii

High Court 12 May 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_jbp

Parties

Date of order

12 May 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/331/2021 Of Smt. Seema Bhattacharya v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Signature Not Verified SAN Digitally signed by CHRISTOPHER PHILIPDate: 2022.05.13 19:06:19 IST 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVON THE 12[th] OF MAY, 2022 REVIEW PETITION No. 331 of 2021 Between:- SMT. SEEMA BHATTACHARYA W/O LATESHANKER BHATTACHARYA, WARD NO. 5,MUKHATIYARGANJ, SATNA (MADHYAPRADESH) -485001 .....PETITIONER (BY SHRI SAPAN USRETHE - ADVOCATE ) ANDPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXII, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, STATIONROAD, NAPIER TOWN, JABALPUR (MADHYAPRADESH) .....RESPONDENT This petition coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following: ORDER At request of learned counsel for petitioner, the review petition isdismissed as withdrawn. Pending interlocutory application is disposed off accordingly. (RAVI MALIMATH)CHIEF JUSTICE (PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV)JUDGE Signature Not VerifiedSAN

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.