Rp/386/2021 Of M/S Icds Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
13 Jan 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/386/2021 Of M/S Icds Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
13 Jan 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/386/2021 Of M/S Icds Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the result, review petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
REVIEW PETITION NO.386 OF 2021
-IN ITA NO.678680/2017
BETWEEN:
M/S. ICDS LTD SYNDICATE HOUSE MANIPAL - 576 104 (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTORSHRI BHARATH KRISHNA NAYAK AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O B. KRISHNA NAYAK.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI C.R. RAGHAVENDRA, ADVCOATE)
AND:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-1, UDUPI RANGE CANARA TOWERS MISSION HOSPITAL ROAD UDUPI - 576 101.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
- - -
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ WITH ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE INSTANT REVIEW PETITION AND REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 03.08.2021 PASSED BY THIS COURT IN ITA NO.678/2017 AND RE-HEAR THE MATTER; GRANT SUCH OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS AS THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT MAY THINK FIT.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Mr. C.R. Raghavendra, learned counsel for the review petitioner.
Mr. K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This petition is filed seeking review of the judgment dated 3.8.2021 passed in ITA.No.678/2017.
3. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for
the parties, we are of the considered opinion that, judgment dated 3.8.2021 neither suffers from any error on the face of the record nor there is any infirmity to warrant interference of this Court in exercise of review jurisdiction.
In the result, review petition fails and is hereby
dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
HR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.