Case Law › High Court › Rp/408/2014 Of Smt.kalavathi v. The Inco...

Rp/408/2014 Of Smt.kalavathi v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 14 Aug 2015 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

14 Aug 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rp/408/2014 Of Smt.kalavathi v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed. od/-JUDGE od/-JUDGE _* | mp

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATEKED THIS THE [‘T]DAY OF AUGUST 2015) PRESENT THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR|AN 1 THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK B.MANOHAR. REVIEW PETITION.NO.408/2014|TN|I.T.A. NO.405/2013| BBRHIWEESMT. KALAVATHIW/O. V.S. BALASUBRAMANYAMAGED ABOUT 56 YEARSRESIDING AT # 7/3,BULL TEMPLE ROADSHANKARPURAMBANGALORE — 560 004. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.CHYTHANYA.K.K, ADV..,) AN):THR INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD —- 3(3), UNITY BUILDING ANNEXEMISSION ROAD|BANGALORE — 560 O27. — RESPONDENT| (BY SRI. K.V.ARAVIND, ADV..,) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO)REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 22/04/2014 PASSED IN ITA|NO. 405/2013, ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH|COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE. THIS REVIEW PERTITION [S COMING ON FORORDERSTHIS|DAY,N.RKUMARJ.,MADE.THE.FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard. No grounds. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed. od/-JUDGE od/-JUDGE _* | mp

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.