In Rp/41/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii Mumbai v. Haryana Ship Breakers Limited, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence the review petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (LOD) NO.80 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.235 OF 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Harayana Ship Breakers Ltd.
..Respondent.
None for the appellant.
Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATED : 3RD MAY, 2012
P.C. :-
None present for the review petitioner. Even on the last occasion, none appeared for the review petitioner. Hence the review petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue