Rp/451/2020 Of Sandeep.s v. Income Tax Officer -Ward 4
High Court
03 Jul 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/451/2020 Of Sandeep.s v. Income Tax Officer -Ward 4
Date of order
03 Jul 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/451/2020 Of Sandeep.s v. Income Tax Officer -Ward 4, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
FRIDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF JULY 2020 / 12TH ASHADHA, 1942
RP.No.451 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 12174/2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12174/2020(V) OF HIGH COURT OFKERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/S:
SANDEEP.S011.
SREENIVAS, OLD THIRUMALA, MULLACKKAL, ALAPPUZHA-688
BY ADV. SRI.A.KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER -WARD 4INCOME TAX OFFICE, ARATTUKULANGARA COMPLEX, A.N. PURAM, ALAPPUZHA-688 011.
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(APPEALS), BAKER HILL, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING. KOTTAYAM -686 002.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT THUSHARA JAMES GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Dated this the 3rd day of July 2020
The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing forsometimes seeks the liberty of this Court for withdrawal of thereview petition with a liberty to file application formodification or recall of the order dated 19.06.2020.
This application is permitted to be withdrawn with aliberty aforementioned.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE
Dxy
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A
JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO 12174 OF 2020 DATED 19.6.2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.