Case LawHigh Court › Rp/451/2020 Of Sandeep.s v. Income Tax O...

Rp/451/2020 Of Sandeep.s v. Income Tax Officer -Ward 4

High Court 03 Jul 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/451/2020 Of Sandeep.s v. Income Tax Officer -Ward 4
Date of order
03 Jul 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rp/451/2020 Of Sandeep.s v. Income Tax Officer -Ward 4, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL FRIDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF JULY 2020 / 12TH ASHADHA, 1942 RP.No.451 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 12174/2020 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12174/2020(V) OF HIGH COURT OFKERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/S: SANDEEP.S011. SREENIVAS, OLD THIRUMALA, MULLACKKAL, ALAPPUZHA-688 BY ADV. SRI.A.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT/S: 1INCOME TAX OFFICER -WARD 4INCOME TAX OFFICE, ARATTUKULANGARA COMPLEX, A.N. PURAM, ALAPPUZHA-688 011. 2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(APPEALS), BAKER HILL, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING. KOTTAYAM -686 002. OTHER PRESENT: SMT THUSHARA JAMES GP THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Dated this the 3rd day of July 2020 The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing forsometimes seeks the liberty of this Court for withdrawal of thereview petition with a liberty to file application formodification or recall of the order dated 19.06.2020. This application is permitted to be withdrawn with aliberty aforementioned. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE Dxy APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO 12174 OF 2020 DATED 19.6.2020
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan