Case LawHigh Court › Rp/463/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income...

Rp/463/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S Wipro Ge Medical Systems Pvt Ltd

High Court 21 Dec 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/463/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S Wipro Ge Medical Systems Pvt Ltd
Date of order
21 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Rp/463/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S Wipro Ge Medical Systems Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The review petition is, accordingly, allowed. — SD/-JUDGE| SD/-|JUDGE kKVK

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU| ON THE 21 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2018 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH| AND| THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN REVIEW PETITION NO.463 OF 2018 BETWEEN 1.PR, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-/| BMTC COMPLEX,KORAMANGALA,BENGALURU.KORAMANGALA,BENGALURU. 2.|DY, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 12(5), BENGALURU. .. PETLTIONERS (BY SRI E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) ANI M/S. WIPRO GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.PLOT NO.4, KADUGODI INDL. AREA,| SADARMANGALA, BENGALURU. .. RESPONDENT KOK OK THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4/7RULES 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE C.P.C.,.PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 22-11-2018|IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.950 OF 2017 AND RESTORE|THE APPEAL OF THE PETITIONER-APPELLANT TO BE)HEARD INDEPENDENTLY AFRESH. © THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Income Tax Appeal No.950 of 2017 was disposed|off py following the earlier order in the assessee’s own|case in Income Tax Appeal No.902 of 2008, disposed off|on 19-1-2016. It is presently submitted that the said)appeal is disposed off in favour of the Revenue so far as substantial question of law No.6 is concerned. 2. On considering the contention, we are of the considered view that there is an error apparent on the face of the record, even thougn the order was passed Dased ontne submission made. Consequently,tneorderdated22-11-2018ISrecalled. Income Tax Appeal No.950 of 2017 is restored to |file. The review petition is, accordingly, allowed. — SD/-JUDGE| SD/-|JUDGE kKVK
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan