Rp/482/2024 Of Muhammed C K v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
04 Jun 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/482/2024 Of Muhammed C K v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/482/2024 Of Muhammed C K v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 482 OF 2024 3 not made out any case for exercise of review jurisdiction.Accordingly, the Review Petition stands dismissed. ajt Sd/- GOPINATH P., JUDGE APPENDIX OF RP 482/2024
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 4 DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 14TH JYAISHTA, 1946RP NO. 482 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.9269 OF 2024 OF HIGH
COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
MUHAMMED C KAGED 39 YEARSCHETTUKKUZHIYIL, KARANTHUR, KUNNAMANGALAM AMSOM, KOZHIKKODE, PIN - 673571BY ADVS.BEJOY JOSEPH P.J.P.RAGHUNATHANBONNY BENNYTHASLEENA.K.K.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS:
1ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE 2, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673001CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673001
2PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, IS PRESS ROAD ,KOCHI, PIN - 682018CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, IS PRESS ROAD ,KOCHI, PIN - 682018
BY ADVS.NAVANEETH.N.NATH
SUSIE B VARGHESE(K/1300/2019)
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON04.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This Review Petition has been filed on the strength of
the information received by the Review Petitioner underthe provisions of the Right to Information Act from theNilambur Police Station that no requisition/warrant ofauthorization under Section 132A of the Income Tax Act,1961 had been issued.
2.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
Income Tax Department has filed a memo producingtherewith the warrant of authorisation issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 132A of the Income Tax Act which isseen acknowledged by the Sub Inspector of Police,Nilambur on 08.06.2022.
3.In the light of the above, it appears that theinformation provided to the Review Petitioner under theRight to Information Act from the Nilambur police stationis incorrect. Since this is the only ground raised in thereview petition, I am of the view that the petitioner has
In the light of the above, it appears that the
RP NO. 482 OF 2024 3
not made out any case for exercise of review jurisdiction.Accordingly, the Review Petition stands dismissed.
ajt
Sd/-
GOPINATH P., JUDGE
APPENDIX OF RP 482/2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.