Case LawHigh Court › Rp/487/2019 Of The Andoorkonam Service C...

Rp/487/2019 Of The Andoorkonam Service Co-Operative Bnk Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 18 Jun 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/487/2019 Of The Andoorkonam Service Co-Operative Bnk Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Rp/487/2019 Of The Andoorkonam Service Co-Operative Bnk Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 28TH JYAISHTA, 1941 RP.No.487 of 2019 IN WP(C). 12501/2019 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12501/2019 DATED 24.04.2019 OFHIGHCOURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C): THE ANDOORKONAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BNK LTD. NO. 3127, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KEEZHAVOOR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 584. BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP(C): 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-2 (1), OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-2, 1ST FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 003. OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 003 SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM ,SC,INCOME TAX THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R While disposing of the writ petition,though it was ordered that the respondents shallnot proceed with any coercive action, it is notseen typed in the judgment. I find that it wasonly inadvertent error that such a directionhappened to be omitted. Therefore the Revision Petition isallowed. In the judgment dated 24.04.2019, thefollowing direction shall be added. “The respondents shall not take any coerciveaction against the petitioner pending disposal ofExt.P6 stay petition.” Sd/-P.V.ASHAJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE I A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED03.05.2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE IIA TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 14.05.2019SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan