Rp/504/2020 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S Signet Impex Pvt. Ltd
High Court
30 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_ind
Parties
Rp/504/2020 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S Signet Impex Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
30 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Rp/504/2020 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S Signet Impex Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, the review petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFOREHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLAON THE 30[th] OF JANUARY, 2024REVIEW PETITION No. 504 of 2020
BETWEEN:-
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)AAYKAR BHAWAN, HOSHANGABAD ROAD, BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY MS. VEENA MANDLIK - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
M/S SIGNET IMPEX PVT. LTD. 114, TRADE HOUSE, 14/3,SOUTH TUKOGANJ, STREET NO. 3, INDORE (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
This petition coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi
Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following:
ORDER
This petition is filed seeking to review the order dated 31.10.2019 passedin Income Tax Appeal No.27 of 2016. In terms whereof the appeal wasdismissed as withdrawn as follows:-
"The present appeal is covered under the circular issued bythe Department and the learned counsel for the appellantprays for withdrawal of the present appeal. The prayer isallowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, thequestion of law is left open."
O n a specific question being asked, it is submitted by the petitioner'scounsel that there is no order passed on merits. However, the question ofconsidering the merits of this case would not arise for consideration, since theappellant's counsel chose to withdraw the appeal. Therefore, the said contentionis without any basis.
When the appeal has been dismissed as withdrawn, there is no ground toreview the said order.
Hence, the review petition is dismissed.
Pending interlocutory application is disposed off.
RJ
(RAVI MALIMATH)CHIEF JUSTICE
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.