Rp/518/2011 Of The State Bank Of Travancore, Poojappura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvpm
High Court
19 Nov 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/518/2011 Of The State Bank Of Travancore, Poojappura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvpm
Date of order
19 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/518/2011 Of The State Bank Of Travancore, Poojappura v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvpm, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/28TH KARTHIKA, 1936
RP.No. 518 of 2011 ( ) IN ITA.211/2009
----------------------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN ITA 211/2009 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 16-03-2011REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, POOJAPPURA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E)
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT:
----------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TVPM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-11-2014,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC & ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JJ.
--------------------------------------------------
R.P.No.518 of 2011inI.T.Appeal No.211 OF 2009--------------------------------------------------
DATED THIS THE 19[th] DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014
ORDER
ANTONY DOMINIC , J.
The learned counsel for the review petitioner submitted thatthe Review Petition has become infructuous. The same isaccordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
dsn
Sd/-ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue