Rp/528/2010 Of The South Indian Bank Ltd v. The Commissionr Of Incometax
High Court
30 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/528/2010 Of The South Indian Bank Ltd v. The Commissionr Of Incometax
Date of order
30 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/528/2010 Of The South Indian Bank Ltd v. The Commissionr Of Incometax, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: We therefore allow the Review Petition by recalling thejudgment dated 16/12/2009 in the I.T.A. with a direction to the Registry to post I.T.A.No.802/2009 before the DivisionBench for hearing.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
RP.No. 528 of 2010()
--------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN ITA.802/2009 DATED 16/12/2009
....................
REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENT
--------------------------------
THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., TRICHUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E)
RESPONDENT(S): / APPELLANT
---------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TRICHUR.
BY MR.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 30/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
R.P.NO.528/2010
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE-A :COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 16/12/2009 IN I.T.A.NO.1183/2009OF THE FULL BENCH.
//TRUE COPY//
jg
PA TO JUDGE.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & HARUN UL-RASHID &V.K.MOHANAN, JJJ.
....................................................................
R.P.No.528 of 2010inI.T.A.No.802 of 2009
....................................................................
Dated this the 30th day of November, 2011.
O R D E R
Ramachandran Nair, J.
This Review Petition is filed to revoke part of thejudgment dated 16/12/2009 wherein we have held that themain issue stands decided against the Review Petitioner(assessee) vide the Full Bench judgment in I.T.A.No.161/2009& connected cases.
2.Before us both sides agree that the issue decided bythe Full Bench does not arise in this appeal and so far as theissues raised in the appeal are concerned, the matter isalready sent back by the Full Bench to the Division Bench fordeciding those issues.
We therefore allow the Review Petition by recalling thejudgment dated 16/12/2009 in the I.T.A. with a direction to
the Registry to post I.T.A.No.802/2009 before the DivisionBench for hearing.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)
(HARUN UL-RASHID, JUDGE)
(V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE)
jg
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.