Rp/536/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.ramesh Reddy
High Court
09 Jan 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/536/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.ramesh Reddy
Date of order
09 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/536/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.ramesh Reddy, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In that view of the matter, no penalty can be imposed. — Accordingly, review petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU|
DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF JANUARY 2015
PRESENT|
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR
ANT)
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR |
REVIEW PETITION NO.536 OF 2013IN ITA NO. 1024 OF 200
BETWEEN :
1.THERE COMMISSIONER OF [INCOME-TC.R.BUILDING|C.R.BUILDING|
QUEENS ROAD|
BANGALORE
2.THERE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX|
CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(3)
C.R.BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD|
BANGALORE .. PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
SRI.K.RAMBSH RBDDYNO.993/1, SUNKAMMA NILAYA>' CROSS, HAL 3) STAGENEW THIPPASANDRABANGALORE —- 5600 O7
.. RESPONDENT
THIS REVIBW PRTITION [IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE1 OF CPC, PRAYING)TO REVIEW THR ORDBR DATED|03/10/2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.1024/2008 ON THE FILE OF THEHON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE.
THIS REVIEW PRTITION [IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THISDAY,N.KUMAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This review petition is filed by the revenue seekingreviewot theorderdated03.10.2012|passedITA No.1024/2008. It relates to levy of penalty, which is)
in
being set aside by this Court in the impugned order. The!penalty was imposed on the basis of the order of block)assessment passed under Section 158BC of the Income Tax)Act, 1961.
2 |It is submitted that the order of block assessment
itself is set aside. In that view of the matter, no penalty can be
imposed. —
Accordingly, review petition is dismissed.
HJ
SD/-.
JUDGE
SD/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.