Case LawHigh Court › Rp/536/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/536/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.ramesh Reddy

High Court 09 Jan 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/536/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.ramesh Reddy
Date of order
09 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/536/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.ramesh Reddy, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In that view of the matter, no penalty can be imposed. — Accordingly, review petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU| DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF JANUARY 2015 PRESENT| THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR ANT) THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR | REVIEW PETITION NO.536 OF 2013IN ITA NO. 1024 OF 200 BETWEEN : 1.THERE COMMISSIONER OF [INCOME-TC.R.BUILDING|C.R.BUILDING| QUEENS ROAD| BANGALORE 2.THERE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX| CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(3) C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD| BANGALORE .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.) AND : SRI.K.RAMBSH RBDDYNO.993/1, SUNKAMMA NILAYA>' CROSS, HAL 3) STAGENEW THIPPASANDRABANGALORE —- 5600 O7 .. RESPONDENT THIS REVIBW PRTITION [IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE1 OF CPC, PRAYING)TO REVIEW THR ORDBR DATED|03/10/2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.1024/2008 ON THE FILE OF THEHON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE. THIS REVIEW PRTITION [IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THISDAY,N.KUMAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This review petition is filed by the revenue seekingreviewot theorderdated03.10.2012|passedITA No.1024/2008. It relates to levy of penalty, which is) in being set aside by this Court in the impugned order. The!penalty was imposed on the basis of the order of block)assessment passed under Section 158BC of the Income Tax)Act, 1961. 2 |It is submitted that the order of block assessment itself is set aside. In that view of the matter, no penalty can be imposed. — Accordingly, review petition is dismissed. HJ SD/-. JUDGE SD/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan