Case LawHigh Court › Rp/537/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/537/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.govinda Reddy

High Court 09 Jan 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/537/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.govinda Reddy
Date of order
09 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/537/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.govinda Reddy, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In that view of the matter, no penalty can beimposed. © Accordingly, review petition is dismissed.| HJ SD/- JUDGE SD/-.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURUDATED THIS THE: DAY OF JANUARY 2015) PRESENT THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR ANT) THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICKH B.MANOHAR REVIEW PETITION NO.537 OF 2013IN ITA NO.1022 OF 2008 BETWEEN : 1.THE COMMISSIONEBR OF INCOME -TA C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE 2.THERE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX| CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(3) C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE .. PKHTITIONERS (BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.) AND : SRI.K.GOVINDA REDDYNO.1198, RENUKA NILAYA# CROSS, HAL II STAGENEW THIPPASANDRABANGALORE — 560 075| _ RESPONDENT| THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE1OFCPC,PRAYINGTO)REVIEWTHERORDERDATED03/10/2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.1022/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE)HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE. THIS RBEVIBW PRTITION [IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIDAY,N.KUMAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This review petition is filed by the revenue seekingreviewOT|theOrderdated03.10.2012.passedITA No.1022/2008. It relates to levy of penalty, which is |being set aside by this Court in the impugned order. The|penalty was imposed on the basis of the order of block|assessment passed under Section 158BC of the Income Tax|Act, 1961. in | |It is submitted that the order of block assessment itself is set aside. In that view of the matter, no penalty can beimposed. © Accordingly, review petition is dismissed.| HJ SD/- JUDGE SD/-. JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan