Case LawHigh Court › Rp/574/2015 Of Sri Dinesh D Ranka v. The...

Rp/574/2015 Of Sri Dinesh D Ranka v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 04 Mar 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/574/2015 Of Sri Dinesh D Ranka v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rp/574/2015 Of Sri Dinesh D Ranka v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATBD THIS THER 0 DAY OF MARCH, 2016 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOU DAR ANTI) THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.P. NO.574/ 201 BETWEEN: SRI DINESH D. RANKA.AGKD ABOUT 61 YBEARS9/O LATE DEVRAJ RANKA| FLOOR, RANKA CHAMBERS|NO.31, CUNNINGHAM ROADBANGALORE-560 O52.... PETITTIONER (BY SRI.S. PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1.)THR COMMISSIONBR OFINCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE,C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE -56000 1iaTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX.CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(3)C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE -56000 1—. RESPONDENTS(BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) 2 THIS REVIEW PEITITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47RULE 1 OF CPC PRAYING THIS HON’BLEK COURT TO RBVIEWTHE ORDER DATED 11.00.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.75/2009,|ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,BANGALORE.| THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THISDAY,MOHAN1’)SHANTANAGOU DARJ9)IMADE.THERFOLLOWING: ORDER Heard. There are no grounds to review the order dated| 11.06.2015 passed in ITA No.75/2009. Accordingly, the. review petition standsdismissed Sd/-.JUDGE DR Sd/-.JUDGE|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan