Rp/574/2015 Of Sri Dinesh D Ranka v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
04 Mar 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/574/2015 Of Sri Dinesh D Ranka v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/574/2015 Of Sri Dinesh D Ranka v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATBD THIS THER 0 DAY OF MARCH, 2016
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOU DAR
ANTI)
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
R.P. NO.574/ 201
BETWEEN:
SRI DINESH D. RANKA.AGKD ABOUT 61 YBEARS9/O LATE DEVRAJ RANKA| FLOOR, RANKA CHAMBERS|NO.31, CUNNINGHAM ROADBANGALORE-560 O52.... PETITTIONER
(BY SRI.S. PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.)THR COMMISSIONBR OFINCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE,C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE -56000 1iaTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX.CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(3)C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE -56000 1—. RESPONDENTS(BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS REVIEW PEITITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47RULE 1 OF CPC PRAYING THIS HON’BLEK COURT TO RBVIEWTHE ORDER DATED 11.00.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.75/2009,|ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,BANGALORE.|
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THISDAY,MOHAN1’)SHANTANAGOU DARJ9)IMADE.THERFOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard.
There are no grounds to review the order dated|
11.06.2015 passed in ITA No.75/2009. Accordingly, the.
review petition standsdismissed
Sd/-.JUDGE
DR
Sd/-.JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.