Case LawHigh Court › Rp/576/2012 Of Sri.sushil Vijoy Arora v....

Rp/576/2012 Of Sri.sushil Vijoy Arora v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kochi

High Court 05 Aug 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/576/2012 Of Sri.sushil Vijoy Arora v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kochi
Date of order
05 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rp/576/2012 Of Sri.sushil Vijoy Arora v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kochi, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: The Review Petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/14TH SRAVANA, 1938 RP.No. 576 of 2012 () IN ITA.1122/2009 ---------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN ITA 1122/2009 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED02-01-2012 REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT:-:------------------------- SRI.SUSHIL VIJOY ARORA, C/O.ISWARDASSONS, BAZAAR ROAD, KOCHI-2 BY ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E) RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT:-: ------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.CHITAMBARESH & K.HARILAL JJ. ----------------------- R.P.No.576 of 2012 in ITA.No.1122/2009 ----------------------- Dated this the 5[th] day of August, 2016 O R D E R Chitambaresh, J. The judgment sought to be reviewed concludes as follows:- “However, since we are allowing the DepartmentalAppeals, we leave it open to the respondents-assessees to claim credit based on the very sameTDS certificates against the interest income assessedin the year in which such income is assessed.” Needless to say that the TDS certificates already produced can also be reckoned towards the interest income assessed in the year in which such income is assessed. The Review Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge. nj/05.08.2016 Sd/- Judge. K.HARILAL, //True Copy// P.S. to Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan