Case LawHigh Court › Rp/605/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/605/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Canbank Financial Services Ltd

High Court 15 Jun 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/605/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Canbank Financial Services Ltd
Date of order
15 Jun 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Rp/605/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Canbank Financial Services Ltd, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 15[th]day of June, 2012 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR ANT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR RP No. 605 ot 2O1 IN ITA No. 1389 of 2006 BBRITIWE 1.The Commissioner of Income TaxC.R. BuildingQueens RoadBangalore 2.The Deputy Commissioner ofIncome TaxSpecial Range-6C.R. BuildingQueens RoadBangalore ...Petitione (By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate) 2 AND: M/s. Canbank Financial Services Ltd.,6[th]Floor, Naveen Complex14, M.G. RoadBangalore...Responde This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 ofCPC praying for review of the order dated 10-11-2010 passedin ITA No.1389 of 2006 on the file of the Hon’ble High Court ofKarnataka, Bangalore. This Review Petition coming on for orders this day,ARAVIND KUMARJ>made the following:-a ORDER Petitioner is seeking for review of the order passed by thisCourt on 10.11.2010 whereunder this Court has held that inthe event of Apex Court reviewing the ONGC’s case reported in(2004) 6 SCC 437, appellant would be at liberty to revive theappeal. 2. In view of the Apex Court order dated 8.4.2011, theremedy available to the petitioner is to seek revival of the orderpassed by this Court on 10.11.2010 by filing an appropriate application in the said appeal and not seeking review of theorder. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek for revival ofthe order passed by this Court on 10.11.2010, this reviewpetition is rejected. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan