Rp/607/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Cheslind Textiles Ltd
High Court
08 Jun 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/607/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Cheslind Textiles Ltd
Date of order
08 Jun 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/607/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Cheslind Textiles Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2012,
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA
BETWEEN :
RP. No.607 OF 2011
1 The Commissioner of Income Tax,C.R.Building,Queens Road,Bangalore.2 The Deputy Commissioner of Income- Tax,Circle-11(2),C.R.Building,Queens Road,Bangalore. ...Petitioners(By Shri. K.V.Aravind, Advocate)AND :M/s. Cheslind Textiles Ltd.,No.40, 100 Feet Road,IV Block, Koramangala,Bangalore.
...Respondent****
This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to review the order dated 29/06/2010 passed in ITA.No.780/2006, on the file of the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore.
This Review Petition coming on for Orders, this day, N.K.Patil J., made the following:
O R D E R
This Review Petition is filed for review of the judgment dated
29[th] June 2010, passed in I.T.A.No.780/2006, by this Court.
2. Shri.K.V. Aravind, learned counsel appearing for petitioners
submits that I.A.I/2012 for condoning delay as also the review petition
filed by the petitioners may be dismissed as not pressed, reserving liberty to the petitioners to file necessary application for rectifying the typographical error that has crept in the judgment passed by this Court.
3. The submission made by the learned counsel for petitioners,
as stated supra, is placed on record. I.A.I/2012 as well as the Review Petition filed by petitioners are dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioners to file necessary application seeking
correction of the judgment, if they are so advised or need arise. Ordered accordingly.
BMV*
SD/- JUDGE SD/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue