Case Law › High Court › Rp/609/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/609/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Indian Telephone Industries

High Court 22 Jun 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

22 Jun 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Rp/609/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Indian Telephone Industries, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Review Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 22[nd]day of June, 2012 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR ANT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH R. P No. 609 oft 201 IN ITA No. 366 of 2010 BBRITIWE 1.The Commissioner of Income TaxC.R. Building, Queens RoadC.R. Building, Queens Road Bangalore — 1. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-11 (3), C.R. Building, Queens Road Bangalore _.. Petition (By Sri K.V.Aravind, Advocate) AND: 2 M/s Indian Telephone IndustriesNO. 45/1, Magrath Road,Bangalore, ... Respond This Review Petition is filed under Section 26OOA of thIncome Tax Act, praying for review of the order dated 28.3.2011passed in ITA No. 366 of 2010 on the file of the Hon’ble HighCourt of Karnataka, Bangalore. This Review Petition coming on for orders this day,N KUMARJ9made the following:- a ORDER Petitioners have filed a memo seeking leave of the Courtto withdraw the review petition. ”.?. Memo is allowed. Review Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.