Case LawHigh Court › Rp/610/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/610/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd

High Court 15 Jun 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/610/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd
Date of order
15 Jun 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/610/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Review Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

` IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE15TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH REVIEW PETITION No.610 OF 2011 IN ITA.NO.95 OF 2010 BETWEEN : 1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C.R.BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001. 2 THE ASST COMMISSINER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-11(5)CIRCLE-11(5) C.R.BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. ...PETITIONERS ( BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND : M/S KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD SHAKTHI BHAVAN, NO.32, RACE COURSE ROAD,BANGALORE. ...RESPONDENT THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 22.6.2011 PASED IN ITA.NO.95/2010. THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, N.KUMAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER The memo is filed on behalf of the Review petitioner seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the Review Petition. 2.The memo is taken on record. The Review Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE rsk/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan