Case Law › High Court › Rp/619/2020 Of Dy. Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/619/2020 Of Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax I (I) v. Shri V.k. Brahmankar

High Court 05 Jan 2023 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_jbp

Parties

Date of order

05 Jan 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/619/2020 Of Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax I (I) v. Shri V.k. Brahmankar, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the review petition stands dismissed as abated against the respondent/assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRAON THE 5[th] OF JANUARY, 2023 REVIEW PETITION No. 619 of 2020 BETWEEN:- DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I (I) BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH) (BY SHRI ASHUTOSH UPADHYAYA - ADVOCATE) .....PETITIONER AND SHRI V.K. BRAHMANKAR, R/O E-768, ARERA COLONY,BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) (BY SHRI MUKESH AGRAWAL - ADVOCATE) .....RESPONDENT This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following: ORDER It is submitted that respondent/assessee has expired more than two yearsback. Therefore, time was granted to the petitioner to do the needful. As on date needful has not been done by the petitioner. Hence, we donot find any ground to proceed further in this petition. Accordingly, the review petition stands dismissed as abated against the respondent/assessee. Pending interlocutory application also stands disposed off. (RAVI MALIMATH)CHIEF JUSTICE MSP Digitally signed by MANVENDRA SINGH PARIHAR Date: 2023.01.06 15:28:22 +05'30' 2 (VISHAL MISHRA)JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.