Rp/664/2016 Of Shamsudheen v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
25 Aug 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/664/2016 Of Shamsudheen v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/664/2016 Of Shamsudheen v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, the Review petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/3RD BHADRA, 1938
RP.No. 664 of 2016
------------------
WP(C) 20396/2016, DATED 7/7/2016---------------
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
-------------------------------
SHAMSUDHEEN C.P, S/O.KUNJAHAMMED, CHAKAPURAKKAL HOUSE, ANAMANGAD P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN: 679 357.
BY ADV. SRI.TOMSON T.EMMANUEL
RESPONDENT(S):--------------
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOZHIKODE 673 001. KOZHIKODE 673 001.
2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION), KOZHIKODE - 673 001. (INVESTIGATION), KOZHIKODE - 673 001.
3. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, KOZHIKODE 673 001. KOZHIKODE 673 001.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RP.No. 664 of 2016 ------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEAXURE-----------------------
ANNEAXURE A1: COPY OF LETTER DATED 26/7/16 ISSUED TO PETITIONER BY THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,PERINTHALMANNA IN CONNECTION WITH ISSUANCE OF BANK GUARANTEE.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEAXURE-----------------------
NIL.
/ TRUE COPY /
PJ
P.S. TO JUDGE
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
---------------------------------------
Review Petition No. 664 of 2016
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 25[th] day of August, 2016
O R D E R
This review petition is filed seeking for review of theorder by which direction had been issued to release theamount seized by giving a bank guarantee of the NationalizedBank.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he isready and willing to provide a bank guarantee from aCo-operative Bank. I do not think that the judgment suffersany error apparent on the face of record which warrantsreview. Hence, the Review petition is dismissed.
DMR/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.