Case LawHigh Court › Rp/664/2016 Of Shamsudheen v. The Commis...

Rp/664/2016 Of Shamsudheen v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 25 Aug 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/664/2016 Of Shamsudheen v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/664/2016 Of Shamsudheen v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the Review petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/3RD BHADRA, 1938 RP.No. 664 of 2016 ------------------ WP(C) 20396/2016, DATED 7/7/2016--------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER: ------------------------------- SHAMSUDHEEN C.P, S/O.KUNJAHAMMED, CHAKAPURAKKAL HOUSE, ANAMANGAD P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN: 679 357. BY ADV. SRI.TOMSON T.EMMANUEL RESPONDENT(S):-------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOZHIKODE 673 001. KOZHIKODE 673 001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION), KOZHIKODE - 673 001. (INVESTIGATION), KOZHIKODE - 673 001. 3. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, KOZHIKODE 673 001. KOZHIKODE 673 001. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RP.No. 664 of 2016 ------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEAXURE----------------------- ANNEAXURE A1: COPY OF LETTER DATED 26/7/16 ISSUED TO PETITIONER BY THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,PERINTHALMANNA IN CONNECTION WITH ISSUANCE OF BANK GUARANTEE. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEAXURE----------------------- NIL. / TRUE COPY / PJ P.S. TO JUDGE A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J. --------------------------------------- Review Petition No. 664 of 2016 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 25[th] day of August, 2016 O R D E R This review petition is filed seeking for review of theorder by which direction had been issued to release theamount seized by giving a bank guarantee of the NationalizedBank. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he isready and willing to provide a bank guarantee from aCo-operative Bank. I do not think that the judgment suffersany error apparent on the face of record which warrantsreview. Hence, the Review petition is dismissed. DMR/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan