Case LawHigh Court › Rp/683/2022 Of Indian Institute Of Scien...

Rp/683/2022 Of Indian Institute Of Science v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 24 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/683/2022 Of Indian Institute Of Science v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rp/683/2022 Of Indian Institute Of Science v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In the result, the petition fails and is hereby dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byRUPA VLocation:High Courtof Karnataka IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF MARCH, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR REVIEW PETITION NO.683 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE SCIENCE INSTITUTE POST OFFICE BENGALURU 560012 REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR MS. INDULMATI SRINIVASAM. …PETITIONER (BY MS. KAVITHA JHA, ADV., FOR MR. PRASHANTH KUMAR D, ADV.,) AND:1. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), CIRCLE, 16(2) BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560032. …RESPONDENT THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE REVIEW PETITION BY REVIEWING THE JUDGMENT DATED 14/07/2021 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN ITA NO. 277/2015 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS, AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This petition has been filed seeking review of the judgment dated 14.07.2021 passed in ITA No.277/2015. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has read some paragraphs from our judgment as well as some paragraphs of the review petition. However, in our considered opinion, she has failed to point out as to how the judgment suffers from an error of the face of the record. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner at length in our considered opinion, the judgment dated 14.07.2021 passed in ITA No.277/2015 neither suffers from jurisdictional infirmity nor any error apparent on the face of the record, warranting interference of this court in exercise of review jurisdiction. In the result, the petition fails and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE SS
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan