Rp/700/2015 Of Shri.k.p.madhavan Nair v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/28TH MAGHA, 1937 RP.No. 700 of 2015 () IN ITA.20/2015 -------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 20/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 03-06-2015 REVIEW PETITIONER(S)APPELLANT: ---------------------------------------- SHRI.K.P.MADHAVAN NAIR KANATHUR, MULIYAR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT-671 542. BY ADVS.SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT: ---------------------------- THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NO.I, KASARAGOD. ADV.SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR INCOME TAX THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-02-2016,ALONG WITH RP. 701/2015, RP. 702/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSEDTHE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & SHAJI P.CHALY, JJ.-----------------------------------RP.No.700/15 in ITA.No.20/15, RP.No.701/15 inITA.No.19/15 & RP.No.702/15 in ITA.No.44/15 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 17[th] day of February, 2016 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. The captioned review petitions are filed seekingreview of the common judgment disposing ofI.T.A.Nos.20/15, 19/15 and 44/15. The ground urgedin the review petitions itself will disclose thatwhat is attempted by the review petitioner isessentially re-hearing of the appeals withoutdisclosing any error apparent on the judgment soughtto be reviewed. Such an exercise is impermissible ina review petition and for that reason, we are notinclined to entertain these petitions. The reviewpetitions are accordingly dismissed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. Sd/- SHAJI P.CHALY, Judge. kkb. /True copy/ PS to Judge