Rp/7/2022 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Laxmipat Dudheria (Huf)
High Court
24 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/7/2022 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Laxmipat Dudheria (Huf)
Date of order
24 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Rp/7/2022 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Laxmipat Dudheria (Huf), the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, the following: ORDER (a)Review petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedby YASHODHA NLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REVIEW PETITION NO. 7 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7, BMTC COMPLEX KORAMANGALA BANGALORE INCOME TAX-7, BMTC COMPLEX KORAMANGALA BANGALORE
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(2), BMTC COMPLEX KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU …PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI. E.I. SANMATHI, STANDING COUNSEL)
AND :
LAXMIPAT DUDHERIA (HUF)NO.66, NAVNIKETAN K.R.ROAD, BASAVANGUDI BENGALURU -4
PAN. AJTPJ9834 B …RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI. DAN D’SILVA FOR SHRI. K.R. PRADEEP, ADVOCATES)
. . . .
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.08.2021 PASSED IN ITA NO.223/2020 AND TO PASS SUITABLE
ORDERS THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Shri. E.I. Sanmathi, learned Standing Counsel for
the petitioners and Shri. Dan D’Silva, learned Advocate for the respondent.
2. Shri. Sanmathi, adverting to Annexure – C (Office Memorandum dated 16.09.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes) pointed out that the order impugned in this review petition has been dismissed on the ground that the tax effect is less than Rupees One Crore and the said bar does not apply to the instant case.
3. We have perused the Circular. Shri. Sanmathi is right in his submission. Therefore, this review petition merits consideration. Hence, the following:
ORDER
(a)Review petition is allowed.
(b)ITA No.223/2020 is restored on Board and Registry
shall place it before the roster Bench.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
SPS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.