Rp/72/2014 Of E.s.jose v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
30 Jan 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/72/2014 Of E.s.jose v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Jan 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/72/2014 Of E.s.jose v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Since there is no ground made out for review of thejudgment, we dismiss the review petition.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014/10TH MAGHA, 1935
RP.No. 72 of 2014 ()
--------------------------------------
(THE JUDGMENT IN ITA.NO. 486/2009 DATED 22-10-2013)
------------------------------------------------
REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:-
--------------------------------------------------------
E.S. JOSE, PROP. A2Z TILES & FLOORINGS, P.T.USHA ROAD, COCHIN - 682 011.
BY SRI.V.V.ASOKAN,SENIOR ADVOCATE
ADV.SRI.S.SUJIN
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT:-
---------------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 30-01-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED
THE FOLLOWING:
R.P.NO.72/2014
APPENDIXPETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX 1COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22/10/13 IN I.T.A.NO.486 OF 2009
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL
/TRUE COPY/P.A.TO.JUDGE
sts
MANJULA CHELLUR,C.J.
&
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.No.72 of 2014 InI.T.A.No.486 of 2009 andC.M.Application No.55 of 2014
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 30th day of January, 2014
O R D E R
Manjula Chellur,CJ
We have gone through the averments in the reviewpetition. Since there is no ground made out for review of thejudgment, we dismiss the review petition.
Hence, petition to condone the delay does not survive forconsideration.
MANJULA CHELLUR, CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.
sj
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.