Case LawHigh Court › Rp/72/2014 Of E.s.jose v. The Commission...

Rp/72/2014 Of E.s.jose v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 30 Jan 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/72/2014 Of E.s.jose v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Jan 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rp/72/2014 Of E.s.jose v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Since there is no ground made out for review of thejudgment, we dismiss the review petition.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DR. MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014/10TH MAGHA, 1935 RP.No. 72 of 2014 () -------------------------------------- (THE JUDGMENT IN ITA.NO. 486/2009 DATED 22-10-2013) ------------------------------------------------ REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:- -------------------------------------------------------- E.S. JOSE, PROP. A2Z TILES & FLOORINGS, P.T.USHA ROAD, COCHIN - 682 011. BY SRI.V.V.ASOKAN,SENIOR ADVOCATE ADV.SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENT/APPELLANT:- --------------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-01-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.P.NO.72/2014 APPENDIXPETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX 1COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22/10/13 IN I.T.A.NO.486 OF 2009 RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/P.A.TO.JUDGE sts MANJULA CHELLUR,C.J. & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.No.72 of 2014 InI.T.A.No.486 of 2009 andC.M.Application No.55 of 2014 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 30th day of January, 2014 O R D E R Manjula Chellur,CJ We have gone through the averments in the reviewpetition. Since there is no ground made out for review of thejudgment, we dismiss the review petition. Hence, petition to condone the delay does not survive forconsideration. MANJULA CHELLUR, CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE. sj
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan