Rp/82/2019 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Analog Devices India Pvt Ltd
High Court
11 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/82/2019 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Analog Devices India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
11 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/82/2019 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Analog Devices India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the review petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019.
PRESENT
THE HON’/BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
R.P.No.82/2019 IN ITA No.374/2017
BETWEEN:
1.THE Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX|! FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,! FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,
80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA,
BENGALURU-560 O95.)
2 |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 11(1), PRESENT ADDRESSCIRCLE 11(1), PRESENT ADDRESS
CIRCLE-1(1) (1), 2 FLOOR, |
BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD,
KORAMANGALA,|
BENGALURU-560 O95.
.. PETLTIONERS|
|BY SRI ARAVIND K.V., ADV.|
AND:|
M/s ANALOG DEVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.,RMZ INFINITY, TOWER D, LEVEL 6,NO.3, OLD MADRAS ROAD,BENGALURU.
RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4/7 RULE1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 08.08.2018
-9.-
PASSED IN ITA NO.374/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE HON BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS|DAY,NAGARATHNA J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though the matter is listed for non compliance ofoffice objections, we have nevertheless heard learned)counsel for the Revenue on the merits of the review|petition.
On hearing learned counsel for the Revenue, we findno error apparent on the face of tne record or otherwise in|the judgment sought to be reviewed in this review petition.
Hence, the review petition is dismissed.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue