Rp/825/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.south India Corporation Ltd
High Court
07 Dec 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/825/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.south India Corporation Ltd
Date of order
07 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/825/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.south India Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Since judgment is rendered based on mistakenstatement by the Standing Counsel, we allow the Review Petition byrecalling the judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2010 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1932
RP.No. 825 of 2010()
--------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN ITA.342/2009
....................
REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT IN I.T.A.
-----------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
-------------------------
M/S. SOUTH INDIA CORPORATION LTD.,
COCHIN.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 07/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................
R.P. No.825 of 2010 in
I.T. Appeal No.342 of 2009
....................................................................
Dated this the 7th day of December, 2010.
ORDER
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Standing Counsel submitted that the reported decision based onwhich the appeal was disposed of has no connection with the issueraised in the appeal. Since judgment is rendered based on mistakenstatement by the Standing Counsel, we allow the Review Petition byrecalling the judgment. Appeal will be posted before the appropriateBench.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
C.K.ABDUL REHIMJudge
pms
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue