Case LawHigh Court › Rp/877/2011 Of The South Indian Bank Ltd...

Rp/877/2011 Of The South Indian Bank Ltd.,Trichur v. The Commissioner Of Incometax, Trichur

High Court 30 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/877/2011 Of The South Indian Bank Ltd.,Trichur v. The Commissioner Of Incometax, Trichur
Date of order
30 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Rp/877/2011 Of The South Indian Bank Ltd.,Trichur v. The Commissioner Of Incometax, Trichur, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: We therefore allow the Review Petition by recalling thejudgment dated 16/12/2009 in the I.T.A. with a direction to the Registry to post I.T.A.No.1091/2009 before the DivisionBench for hearing.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 RP.No. 877 of 2011() -------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 16/12/2009 IN I.T.A.NO.1091/2009) REVIEW PETITIONER(S): / RESPONDENT ---------------------- THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E) RESPONDENT(S): / APPELLANT --------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTRICHUR. BY MR.JOSE JOSEPH, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.P.NO.877/2011 APPENDIX REVIEW PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ANNEXURE-A :OF FULL BENCH. COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 16/12/2009 IN I.T.A.NO.1183/2009 //TRUE COPY// jg PA TO JUDGE. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & HARUN UL-RASHID &V.K.MOHANAN, JJJ. .................................................................... R.P.No.877 of 2011 in I.T.A.No.1091 of 2009 .................................................................... Dated this the 30th day of November, 2011. O R D E R Ramachandran Nair, J. This Review Petition is filed to revoke part of thejudgment dated 16/12/2009 wherein we have held that themain issue stands decided against the Review Petitioner, theassessee, vide the Full Bench judgment in I.T.A.No.161/2009& connected cases. 2.Before us both sides agree that the issue decided bythe Full Bench does not arise in this appeal and so far as theissues raised in the appeal are concerned, the matter isalready sent back by the Full Bench to the Division Bench fordeciding those issues. We therefore allow the Review Petition by recalling thejudgment dated 16/12/2009 in the I.T.A. with a direction to the Registry to post I.T.A.No.1091/2009 before the DivisionBench for hearing. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (HARUN UL-RASHID, JUDGE) (V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE) jg
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan