Case LawHigh Court › Rp/9/2023 Of Suraj Bhan Oil Private Limi...

Rp/9/2023 Of Suraj Bhan Oil Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1) Aaykar Bhawan City Centre

High Court 20 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_gwl
Parties
Rp/9/2023 Of Suraj Bhan Oil Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1) Aaykar Bhawan City Centre
Date of order
20 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/9/2023 Of Suraj Bhan Oil Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1) Aaykar Bhawan City Centre, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, this review petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT GWALIORBEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ROHIT ARYA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGHON THE 20[th] OF NOVEMBER, 2023 REVIEW PETITION No. 9 of 2023 BETWEEN:- SURAJ BHAN OIL PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR SANJAY BANSAL S/O SHRI GOVIND PRASADBANSAL, AGED 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O95 JIWAJI GANJ MORENA, DISTRICT- MORENA(MADHYA PRADESH) (BY SHRI PAWAN DWIVEDI- ADVOCATE) .....PETITIONER AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1),AAYKAR BHAWAN CITY CENTRE GWALIOR (MADHYAPRADESH) (NONE FOR RESPONDENT) .....RESPONDENT This petition coming on for admission this day, Justice Rohit Arya passed the following: ORDER This review petition has been filed seeking review of order dated18/02/2022 passed in ITA No.121/2021. Having perused the impugned order, we find no reason to review theorder under challenge. Accordingly, this review petition is dismissed. (ROHIT ARYA)JUDGE rahul (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH)JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan