Rp/951/2021 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd
High Court
21 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/951/2021 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd
Date of order
21 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/951/2021 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Nadakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
FRIDAY, THE 21 DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 1ST MAGHA, 1943
RP NO. 951 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.10.2021 IN ITA 14/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALAREVIEW PETITIONER:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTRIVANDRUM
BY ADV CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
M/S NADAKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDKOLLAM
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV C.A. JOJO
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.01.2022, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
O R D E R
S.V.Bhatti,J.
Heard Mr Christopher Abraham, learned Senior Standing Counsel,and Mr C.A. Jojo for respondent.
2.The review of judgment dated 25.10.2021 is at the instance ofPrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax, Thiruvananthapuram, filedseeking the review of judgment dated 25.10.2021. This Court byreferring to Mavilayi and Chirackal Service Coperative Bank Ltddismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. In the Review Petition, it ispointed out that the judgment under review is not covered by thejudgments referred to by us while disposing of the tax appeal. Theerrors pointed out by the Review Petitioner deal with admissiblededuction for one of the sources of interest earned by the assessee. The application for review of the judgment is not opposed by theAdvocate appearing for the assessee. This Court firstly for the errorspointed out in the Review Petition and that the review is not seriouslyopposed, is satisfied that the judgment dated 25.10.2021 needs to be
recalled and thereafter Tax appeal considered on merits.
Hence judgment dated 25.10.2021 is recalled, review is allowed. ITA No.14 of 2020 is restored to file. Post I.T.A No.14 of 2020 along withITA No. 7 of 2020.
Sd/-S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
Sd/-BASANT BALAJIJUDGE
JS
RP NO. 951 OF 2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURESAnnexure A1
-4-
APPENDIX OF RP 951/2021
CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN ITA NO. 14/2020 DATED 25-10-2021
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.