Rp/953/2013 Of M/S. Prestige Estates Projects Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
23 Jan 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/953/2013 Of M/S. Prestige Estates Projects Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Jan 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/953/2013 Of M/S. Prestige Estates Projects Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the review petition is |disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE.
DATED THIS THE 23[rd]DAY OF JANUARY 27014|
PRESENT
THE HON‘'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE
AND|
THE HON‘'BLE MR. JUSTICE B MANOHAR
R.P.NO.953/2013
BETWEEN
M/S. PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LTD.THE FALCON HOUSE |NO 1, MAIN GUARD CROSS ROAD _BANGALORE 560 0OO1... PETITIONER.
(BY SRI ASHOK A KULKARNI, ADV.,)
AND
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1)BANGALORE-560 OOL
.. RESPONDENT.
THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER HAS FILED THE!ABOVE REVIEW PETITION UNDER ORDER 4/7 RULE 1 OF CPZ,PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED|08/10/2013 PASSED IN ITA.302/2013, ON THE FILE OF THE)HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE.
THIS R.P. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,|Dilip B. Bnosale J.DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
PC:
In view of tne order dated 27[85]January 2014 passed in|ITA No.25/2013, in particular, the observations made_ inparagraph-4, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not.press this review petition. Hence, the review petition is |disposed of.
Sd/-.JUDGE.Sd/-—JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue