Case Law › High Court › Rp/998/2022 Of Sreedhar Ashok Kumar v. T...

Rp/998/2022 Of Sreedhar Ashok Kumar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 09 Dec 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

09 Dec 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/998/2022 Of Sreedhar Ashok Kumar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.JAYACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 9 DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 RP NO. 998 OF 2022 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN ITA NO.251/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER: SREEDHAR ASHOK KUMAR,AGED 55 YEARS,KOCHI, PIN – 682 016. PROPRIETOR, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, AISWARYA BUILDINGS, VALANJAMBALAM, BY ADV. ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV RESPONDENT: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOCHI, PIN - 682018 C.R. BUILDINGS, I.S.PRESS ROAD, BY ADV. JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.12.2022, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2.. K.VINOD CHANDRAN & C.JAYACHANDRAN, JJ ------------------------------------ R.P.No.998 of 2022 --------------------------------------Dated this the 9[th] day of December, 2022 O R D E R Vinod Chandran,J. Learned counsel for the revision petitionerseeks permission to withdraw the revision petition. Permission granted and the revision petition isdismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/- C.JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE ak

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.