Case LawHigh Court › Rpw/17/2013 Of Khushpat Shah v. The Dire...

Rpw/17/2013 Of Khushpat Shah v. The Director General Of Income Tax (Investigation)

High Court 06 Dec 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Rpw/17/2013 Of Khushpat Shah v. The Director General Of Income Tax (Investigation)
Date of order
06 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rpw/17/2013 Of Khushpat Shah v. The Director General Of Income Tax (Investigation), the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Review Petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.17 OF 2013 In WRIT PETITION NO.292 OF 2013 Mr.Khushpat ShahProprietor of M/s.R.N. Jewellers : Petitioner V/s.The Director General of Income Tax (Investigation) & Anr. : Respondents … Mr.J.D.Mistri with Mr.Pradeep Jetly, Mr.Sandeep Parikh and Mr.Parthsarathi A.M. i/b. Mint and Confreres for the Petitioner. Mr.P.C.Chhotary for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.A. SAYED & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 06, 2013. P.C.: Heard learned Senior Counsel for the Review Petitioner. 2We find no sufficient reason or error apparent on the face of the record to review the order dated 13.03.2013. 3. The Review Petition is dismissed. (A.A. Sayed, J.) (M.S.Sanklecha, J.) 1 of 1
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan