Rpw/94/2013 Of The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Pune v. Indraprastha Premises Pvt. Ltd
High Court
22 Oct 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Rpw/94/2013 Of The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Pune v. Indraprastha Premises Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rpw/94/2013 Of The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Pune v. Indraprastha Premises Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO.94 OF 2013INWRIT PETITION NO.1889 OF 1995
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Pune v/s.Indraprastha Premises Pvt. Limited.
...Petitioner
...Respondent.
---
Mr.Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Vineet Naik, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr.Sukund Kulkarni and Mr.Dipak Deshmukh i/b. Mr.Balaji Gadi, for the respondent.
---
CORAM: A. S. OKA & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
OCTOBER 22, 2013.
P.C.
1.When it was brought to the notice of the learned Senior Counsel, appearing for the petitioner that the Income Tax Department was represented before this Court on 27[th ]September, 2010 and 15[th] November, 2010, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Review Petition with liberty to file appropriate petition/application.
2.Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE,J.) (A.S. OKA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue