Case LawHigh Court › R.s.chn. Pratap Singh Charitable Trust S...

R.s.chn. Pratap Singh Charitable Trust Society v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 16 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
R.s.chn. Pratap Singh Charitable Trust Society v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
16 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In R.s.chn. Pratap Singh Charitable Trust Society v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARR ~ CWP No.19513 of 2010Date of decision :16.1.7019 R.S.Chn. Pratap Singh Charitable Trust Society—_ Patitioner R.S.Chn. Pratap Singh Charitable Trust Society Versus The Chief Commissioner of income Tax. .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL|HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL- Present: Mr.B.M.Monga, Advocate and Mr.Rohit Kaura, Advocate for the petitioner.Mr.Ajay Aggarwal, Advocate forMr.Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the respondent.| AJAY KUMAR MITTAL,J. 1.A challenge is made to the order dated 30.8.2010,|Annexure P.1, wnereby the exemption provided under Section|10(23C)(VI) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment.year 2009-10 has been rejected. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that|necessary relief nas been granted to the petitioner. Accordingly, |it was prayed that the writ petition may be dismissed as|withdrawn. 3. Ordered accordingly. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE. January 16, 2019 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) >JUDGE. KI)| Whether speaking / reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes / No|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan