R.singaravadivelan v. Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,Ministry Of Finance, Room
High Court
30 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
R.singaravadivelan v. Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,Ministry Of Finance, Room
Date of order
30 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In R.singaravadivelan v. Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,Ministry Of Finance, Room, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 220, Section 271 of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
W.P.(MD).No.23334 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
W.P.(MD).No.23334 of 2024and
W.M.P.(MD).Nos.19756 and 19758 of 2024
R.Singaravadivelan
... Petitioner
Vs.
Assessment Unit,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,Ministry of Finance, Room No.401, 2[nd] Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium,Delhi – 110 003.
...Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in order dated 19.08.2024 bearing DIN ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2024-25/1067727977(1) passed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the file of the respondent and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner: Mr.Rahul Unnikrishnan
For Respondent
: Mr.N.Dilipkumar Senior Standing Counsel
1/4
W.P.(MD).No.23334 of 2024
ORDER
The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order of penalty dated 19.08.2024 passed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. In view of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.23335 of 2024 dated 30.09.2024, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the Appellate Authority, if they are aggrieved by the consequential order of penalty. It is also open to the petitioner to move an interim application for stay before the Appellate Authority or the Assessing Authority under Section 220(6) of the Act. If any such application is filed, the same shall be considered and orders shall be passed in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Until then, recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. If the petitioner does not avail of the above opportunity, it is always open to the respondent/authority to proceed with the recovery proceedings in accordance with law.
W.P.(MD).No.23334 of 2024
3. With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petitions are closed.
Index : Yes / NoInternet : Yes/ NoLm
30.09.2024
ToAssessment Unit,Income Tax Department,National Faceless Assessment Centre,Ministry of Finance, Room No.401, 2[nd] Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium,Delhi – 110 003.
3/4
4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD).No.23334 of 2024
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
Lm
W.P.(MD).No.23334 of 2024
30.09.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.