Case LawHigh Court › R.s.parimannavan v. The Deputy Commissio...

R.s.parimannavan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Center(Cpc), Bengaluru-560 500

High Court 24 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
R.s.parimannavan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Center(Cpc), Bengaluru-560 500
Date of order
24 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-2019
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In R.s.parimannavan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Center(Cpc), Bengaluru-560 500, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: The respondents have taken the said fact into consideration and has passed rectification order and deleted the said entry.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY R.S.Parimannavan W.P.(MD)No.17216 of 2023andW.M.P.(MD).No.14420 of 2023 ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Center(CPC), Bengaluru-560 500. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the first respondent in his proceedings in Document Identification No.CPC/1819/U3/326549039, for AY 2018-2019, quash the order dated 06.06.2023 issued therein. For Petitioner : Mr.R.L.RamaniFor Respondent : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar Senior Standing Counsel O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for Certiorari, to quash the impugned order, dated 06.06.2023. 2.At the time of admission, this court has recorded that the respondents have erroneously included an amount of Rs.6,06,85,412/-, when the petitioner has filed stated in the return as NIL. 3. The respondents have taken the said fact into consideration and has passed rectification order and deleted the said entry. Since the prayer sought for in the writ petition was already considered by the respondents, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Index : Yes / NoInternet : YesNCC: Yes / NoSml/Ksa 24.08.2023 To 1.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Center(CPC), Bengaluru-560 500. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Madurai. 4/4https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.SRIMATHY, J Sml/Ksa W.P.(MD)No.17216 of 2023 24.08.2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan