R/Special Civil Application v. Income-Tax Officer
High Court
16 Mar 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
R/Special Civil Application v. Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
16 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In R/Special Civil Application v. Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/SCA/650/2020 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 650 of 2020
==========================================================RUPAM RAJENDRA GORECHA VersusINCOME-TAX OFFICER
==========================================================
Appearance:MR D K TRIVEDI(5283) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MR DEVARSHI C SHAH(5545) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1DELETED(20) for the Respondent(s) No. 3MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 16/03/2020
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
1.On 24[th] February, 2020 this Court passed the following order:-
“Mr. Patel, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Revenue makes a statement that the CIT (A), Vadodara has concluded the hearing of the appeal preferred by the writ applicant. The order is awaited.
Post the matter on 16th March, 2020.”
2.Today, when the matter is taken up for further hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the parties brings to our notice that the CIT(A), Vadodara has allowed the appeal preferred by the writ-applicant.
3.In such circumstances, nothing further is required to be
adjudicated so far as the present writ-application is concerned. As the writ-applicant has succeeded before the CIT(A), the law with regard to the claim of refund will take its own course. This application is disposed of in the above terms.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
aruna
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.