Case LawHigh Court › R/Special Civil Application v. The Deput...

R/Special Civil Application v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 26 Jul 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
R/Special Civil Application v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In R/Special Civil Application v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Therefore, the petition is dismissed as having becomeinfructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6582 of 2021 ==========================================================GAYATRI MICRONS LTD. Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ========================================================== Appearance:MR JAIMIN A GANDHI(8065) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Respondent(s) No. 1========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDIand HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI Date : 26/07/2021 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI) 1. The learned Standing Counsel Mrs.Mauna Bhatt,appearing for the respondent, seeks permissionto place on record the order passed by therespondent authority, dropping the proceedingsagainst the present petitioner under Section 148of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The same is takenon record.appearing for the respondent, seeks permissionto place on record the order passed by therespondent authority, dropping the proceedingsagainst the present petitioner under Section 148of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The same is takenon record. 2. The learned Advocate Mr.Jaimin Gandhi for thepetitioner prays that in view of the said order,appropriate orders be passed by the Court.petitioner prays that in view of the said order,appropriate orders be passed by the Court. 3. The proceedings against the petitioner havingbeen dropped by the respondent authority, thecause of action does not survive. Therefore,been dropped by the respondent authority, thecause of action does not survive. Therefore, the petition is dismissed as having becomeinfructuous. (BELA M. TRIVEDI, J) V.V.P. PODUVAL (A. C. JOSHI,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan