Case LawHigh Court › R/Tax Appeal v. Additional Commissioner...

R/Tax Appeal v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 1

High Court 31 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
R/Tax Appeal v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 1
Date of order
31 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In R/Tax Appeal v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 1, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.In view of the request made on behalf of the appellant –assessee, both the Tax Appeal are disposed of as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 518 of 2014 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 519 of 2014 ==========================================================CLP POWER INDIA PVT. LTD. VersusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE 1 ========================================================== Appearance:MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MR MR BHATT WITH MR KARAN SANGHAVI FOR M R BHATT & CO.(5953) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAandHONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE Date : 31/01/2022 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1.Both the captioned Tax Appeals have been notified todayunder the caption “For Orders”. 2.Mr. Bandish Soparkar, the learned counsel appearing for thethe appellant – asseessee has filed a note stating that as hisclients have availed the benefit of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,they are not desirous to pursue these Tax Appeals any further. Arequest has been made that these Tax Appeals may be disposedof as not pressed. 3.Mr. M.R. Bhatt, the learned senior counsel along with Mr.Karan Sanghani, the learned counsel have appeared on behalf ofthe Revenue . 4.In view of the request made on behalf of the appellant –assessee, both the Tax Appeal are disposed of as not pressed. We clarified that we have otherwise not expressed anyopinion on the merits of the substantial questions of law framed bythis Court at the time of the admission of the two Tax Appeals. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) Y.N. VYAS (NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan