Case LawHigh Court › Ruben Jeyasankari v. Chief Commissioner...

Ruben Jeyasankari v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-4,Income Tax Department, Chennai

High Court 28 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Ruben Jeyasankari v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-4,Income Tax Department, Chennai
Date of order
28 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ruben Jeyasankari v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-4,Income Tax Department, Chennai, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.34392 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.02.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Writ Petition No.34392 of 2023 andW.M.P.No.34296 of 2023 Ruben Jeyasankari ... Petitioner -vs- 1.Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-4,Income Tax Department, Chennai. 2.The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 15(2),No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1[st] respondent to consider the petitioner's application for compounding the offence under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act dated 31.10.2022 and to dispose of the application expeditiously in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy For Respondents : Mr.R.S.Balaji, senior standing counsel 1/4 W.P.No.34392 of 2023 ORDER The petitioner had filed an application for compounding an offence under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Income Tax Act) in respect of non filing of returns. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the application for compounding which was filed on 31.10.2022 and seeks the expeditious consideration and disposal thereof. 3. Mr.R.S.Balaji, learned senior standing counsel, opposes this request by referring to guidelines issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 16.09.2022 to the effect that penalty proceedings should be concluded before a compounding application is decided. He also relies on the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Nilofar Currimbhoy, [2013] 35 taxmann.com 99 (Delhi). 4. Sub-section (2) of Section 279 of the Income Tax Act enables the compounding of any offence under Chapter XXII either before or after the 2/4 W.P.No.34392 of 2023 institution of proceedings by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General or Director General. Since the relevant offence is clearly an offence that falls under Chapter XXII, the statute does not place an embargo on the consideration of the application for compounding. 5. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the compounding application, the 1[st] respondent is directed to consider the compounding application dated 31.10.2022 and dispose of the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 28.02.2024Index : Yes / No(2/2)Internet : Yes / NoNeutral Citation: Yes / No kj 3/4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J. Kj To 1.Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-4,Income Tax Department,Chennai. 2.The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 15(2),No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. Writ Petition No.34392 of 2023 and W.M.P.No.34296 of 2023 28.02.2024(2/2) 4/4
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan