Ruben Jeyasankari v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3
High Court
28 Feb 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Ruben Jeyasankari v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3
Date of order
28 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ruben Jeyasankari v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.02.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Writ Petition No.3956 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.4099 of 2022
Ruben Jeyasankari ... Petitioner
-vs-
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3,No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to file Form-4 under Section 5 and Rule 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Rules, 2020 respectively.
For Petitioner : Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy
For Respondent : Mr.R.S.Balaji, senior standing counselSENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.
1/2
ORDER
Kj
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed to withdraw this writ petition. He has made an endorsement for withdrawal. Therefore, W.P.No.3956 of 2022 is dismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
kj
To
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3,No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
Writ Petition No.3956 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.4099 of 2022(1/2)
2/2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.