Rubix Trading Pvt Ltd, Mumbai v. The Income-Tax Officer-3(3)(1), Mumbai & Ors
High Court
03 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Rubix Trading Pvt Ltd, Mumbai v. The Income-Tax Officer-3(3)(1), Mumbai & Ors
Date of order
03 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Rubix Trading Pvt Ltd, Mumbai v. The Income-Tax Officer-3(3)(1), Mumbai & Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
R.M. AMBERKAR
(Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.WRIT PETITION NO. 3127 OF 2018
Rubix Trading Pvt Ltd, Mumbai..Petitioner
Versus
The Income-Tax Officer-3(3)(1), Mumbai & Ors...Respondents
...................
•Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/by Mr. Atul Jasani for the Petitioner
Mr. Sham Walve for Respondent No. 1Mr. Sham Walve for Respondent No. 1
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 3, 2019.
P.C.:
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to
withdraw the petition keeping all contentions of thepetitioner open to be raised during the reassessmentproceedings. Permission as prayed for is granted. Petitiondisposed of accordingly.
[ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue