Rubykon Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
05 Dec 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Rubykon Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rubykon Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No.55 of 2017
Date of decision: 05.12.2017
Rubykon Manufacturing Company
..Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax
… Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?
For the appellant: Mr.Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr.Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms.Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
________________________________________________________________________________
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
It is not in dispute that the substantial questions
of law raised in the present appeal are no longer res integra and are covered by the judgment dated 28[th]November, 2017, rendered by this Court in ITA No.20 of 2015, titled as M/s Stovekraft India vs. Commissioner of Income Tax. The assessee has already availed the benefit of exemption to the extent of limit prescribed under the Income Tax Act.
2. As such, as prayed for, we dispose of the
present appeal, making the directions issued in M/s
Stovekraft India (supra) mutatis mutandi applicable to the
present case also.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
December 5, 2017 (vt)
( Ajay Mohan Goel ) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.