Case Law › High Court › Ruchi Agarwal, Mumbai v. The Income Tax...

Ruchi Agarwal, Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer-24(3)(4), … Respondentsmumbai & Ors

High Court 03 Feb 2016 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

03 Feb 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ruchi Agarwal, Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer-24(3)(4), … Respondentsmumbai & Ors, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Amk (14) WPL 3550-15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3550 OF 2015 Ruchi Agarwal, Mumbai … Petitioner Versus The Income Tax Officer-24(3)(4), … RespondentsMumbai & Ors. ….. Mr. Niraj Sheth a/w. Mr. Atul Jasani for the Petitioner.Mr. Abhay Ahuja for the Respondents. CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.DATE: 3 rd FEBRUARY, 2016. P. C.: 1.Mr. Sheth, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue the statutory remedies available. 2.Liberty as prayed for granted. All contentions kept open. 3.The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.