Rudra Pratap Tripathivs.income Tax Settlement Commission And Ors v. Walve A/W. Pritesh Chatterjee For
High Court
21 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Rudra Pratap Tripathivs.income Tax Settlement Commission And Ors v. Walve A/W. Pritesh Chatterjee For
Date of order
21 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
2013-14, 2020-21
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Rudra Pratap Tripathivs.income Tax Settlement Commission And Ors v. Walve A/W. Pritesh Chatterjee For, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3702 OF 2021
Rudra Pratap TripathiVs.Income Tax Settlement Commission and Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
----
Mr. Aditya Ajgaonkar i/b. Mr. Tanveer Khan for PetitionerMr. Sham V. Walve a/w. Pritesh Chatterjee for Respondents
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 21st DECEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1.Mr. Ajgaonkar tenders a copy of Order dated 28/09/2021 issued by
CBDT bearing F.No.299/22/2021-Dir (Inv.III)/174 in which paragraph 3reads as under:-
"3.In view of the above, the Board in exercise of its powerunder clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), in order to avoid genuine hardship toassessees authorizes the Commission of Income-tax, posted asSecretary to the Settlement Commission prior to 01.02.2021, toadmit an application for settlement on behalf of the InterimBoard filed after 31.01.2021, which is the date mentioned in sub-section (5) of section 245C of the Act for filing such application,and before 30.09.2021 and treat such applications as valid andprocess them as "pending applications' as defined in clause (eb)of section 245A of the act."
2.It is stated in the petition that Petitioner has filed SettlementApplication for A.Y. 2013-14 to A.Y. 2020-21 on 23/03/2021. Since that isbefore the extended date of 30/09/2021 as mentioned in the order, Mr.Walve states that Petitioner's application will also be considered subject toother conditions being fulfilled in accordance with law.
3.Petition accordingly stands disposed.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.