In Rupi v. Chinoy, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
mgn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.706 of 2008
Rupi V. Chinoy
...Petitioner
Vs.
The Income Tax Settlement Commissioner & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. P.R. Toprani for the PetitionersMr.P.S. Sahadevan, for the respondents.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
D.G. KARNIK, JJ.
DATED : 5TH OCTOBER, 2009
P.C.
Rule. Heard forthwith.
2.The issue in this petition is covered by the judgment of this Court in Star
Television News Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors., (2009) 225 CTR 140. For the
reasons set out therein the matter is restored to the file of the Settlement Commission
for deciding the matter in terms of our judgment in Star Television News Ltd.(supra)and limited to the application before it.
3.Rule made absolute accordingly.
(D.G. KARNIK,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue